<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Field Precision software tips &#187; 2D mesh generation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fieldp.com/myblog/tag/2d-mesh-generation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fieldp.com/myblog</link>
	<description>Effective finite-element modeling of electromagnetic fields</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 12:45:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Creating DXF files for Mesh</title>
		<link>http://fieldp.com/myblog/2008/creating-dxf-files-for-mesh/</link>
		<comments>http://fieldp.com/myblog/2008/creating-dxf-files-for-mesh/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 17:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shumphries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2D mesh generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DXF import]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mesh]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fieldp.com/myblog/?p=131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Recently, I had a consulting job that required loading vectors from a complex CAD drawing to the Mesh drawing editor. The work gave me an opportunity to correct several small errors in Mesh when handling large drawing files. It was also a good time to reflect on optimal approaches to creating and importing DXF files for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently, I had a consulting job that required loading vectors from a complex CAD drawing to the <strong>Mesh</strong> drawing editor. The work gave me an opportunity to correct several small errors in <strong>Mesh </strong>when handling large drawing files. It was also a good time to reflect on optimal approaches to creating and importing DXF files for the program. There are two reasons why we included the capability:</p>
<ul>
<li>Dedicated CAD programs have more features than we could include in the <strong>Mesh </strong>drawing editor. In particular, there are extensive options to fit arcs to drawing entities.</li>
<li>You can easily capture vector information from layouts prepared by others.</li>
</ul>
<p>The second option applied to the consulting job. I started the project from a drawing prepared at a national laboratory using the latest version of <strong>AutoCAD</strong>. In this article, I wanted to share my experience and recommend a good CAD program to use with <strong>Mesh</strong>.</p>
<p>My work involves mostly mesh import and a little 2D design work. I am certainly not about to spend $4000 for <strong>AutoCAD</strong>. For many years, I used <strong>TurboCAD</strong> as an alternative. The program began as a basic 2D drawing utility with a cost of about $30. Over the years, under the relentless pressure of mail flyers and internal reminders from the program, I have dutifully upgraded to Version 14. In the effort to stuff in as many features as <strong>AutoCAD</strong>, <strong>TurboCAD </strong>has followed two unfortunate trends:</p>
<ul>
<li>The program has become fragile, complex and generally unapproachable.</li>
<li>The price for the professional version has balooned to over $1000.</li>
</ul>
<p>During the current project, I said a long overdue good-bye to <strong>TurboCAD</strong>. To begin, the DXF files I created crashed <strong>Mesh</strong>. After checking with a text editor, I discovered that <strong>TurboCAD</strong> was adding a thumbnail bitmap image to files by default! Why would anyone put this information in a neutral exchange file that is supposed to be in text format? I was able to turn off this <em>feature</em>, but ran into another problem that was the final straw: I was unable to split an arc vector at its midpoint. Although I followed the instructions exactly, the program refused to perform the operation, emitting an unhelpful error beep with no explanation. An hour&#8217;s search through the help utility provided no  information. I can only speculate that the arc occupied a different quantum state in a three-dimensional <em>world view</em>. Splitting the arc was apparently a greater challenge than splitting the atom.</p>
<p>Fortunately, there is a good alternative. <strong>QCAD </strong>is full-featured program that does only 2D drawings and works directly with DXF files. It has an attractive but idiosyncratic interface. Once I got the sense of how it works, I found it much easier to use than competing programs. It read the DXF file I got from the customer and split the arc with no complaint. Most important, it produces strictly-correct DXF files and has been tested to work with <strong>Mesh</strong>. In fact, it is a good idea to use <strong>QCAD </strong>as a prefilter. The program can read DXF files from a variety of sources and write output files in a clean format.</p>
<p>You can get a working basic copy of <strong>QCAD </strong>for free at</p>
<p><a href="http://source\forge.net/projects/qcadbin-win/" target="_blank">http://source\forge.net/projects/qcadbin-win/</a></p>
<p>Better yet, get the professional version and help support the work that&#8217;s been put into the program. The cost is only €24. It&#8217;s available at:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ribbonsoft.com/qcad.html" target="_blank">http://www.ribbonsoft.com/qcad.html</a></p>
<p>For more information on <strong>Mesh</strong>, please use this link: <a href="http://www.fieldp.com/mesh.html" target="_blank">http://www.fieldp.com/mesh.html</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://fieldp.com/myblog/2008/creating-dxf-files-for-mesh/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

